Alvarez v. May Deptartment Stores Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SUZUKAWA, J.
Plaintiffs and appellants, 1 56 past and present “Area Sales Managers” (ASM’s) employed by defendant and respondent The May Department Stores Company (respondent), alleged both individual and class action claims for failure to pay overtime compensation (Lab. Code, §§ 1194, 1198), conversion, violation of the unfair practices law (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.), and violation of the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (Lab. Code, § 2698 et seq.). Based on the doctrine of collateral estoppel, the trial court sustained without leave to amend respondent’s…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Lucido v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Richards v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In Re Baycol Cases I & IICalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Bufil v. Dollar Financial Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Johnson v. GlaxoSmithKline, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Tucker v. Pacific Bell Mobile ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Ideal v. Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Co. LPNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.