Legal Opinion
Lloyd v. Housing Authority of the Montgomery
District Court, M.D. Alabama
Decided April 27, 2012No. Case No. 2:10-cv-1103-MEFPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion And Order
MARK E. FULLER, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Curtis Lloyd filed suit against his former employer, the Montgomery Housing Authority (MHA), claiming disability discrimination and retaliation for reporting sexual harassment. Now the case comes before the Court on two motions filed by the MHA. The first is a Motion to Strike (Doc. # 35), which is due to be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The second is a Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #29), which is due to be GRANTED.
II. Jurisdiction and Venue
This Court has jurisdiction over Lloyd’s claims under 28 U.S.C. §§…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Howard v. Steris Corp.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2012
- Hale v. JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2017
- Andrews v. Tri Star Sports and Entertainment Group, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2023
- Ball v. UpshiftDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dolgencorp, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.