Legal Opinion

Ball v. Upshift

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided August 17, 2020No. 1:19-cv-00691Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION BRENNAN L. BALL, Case No. 1:19-cv-691 Plaintiff, Litkovitz, M.J. vs. UPSHIFT WORK LLC, ORDER Defendant. I. Introduction Plaintiff Brennan Love Ball brings this action pro se against his former employer Upshift Work LLC1 (Upshift), alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act,

42 U.S.C. § 12101

et seq. (ADA). This matter is before the Court on Upshift’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 20), plaintiff’s response in opposition (Doc. 27), and Upshift’s reply (Doc. 28). Although requested, the Court has deemed…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API