Legal Opinion
Hale v. Johnson
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided March 28, 2017No. Case No. 1:15-cv-14PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HARRY S. MATTICE, JR.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 10) filed by Plaintiff James Hale and the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 25) filed by Defendant Bill Johnson. For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds that Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 10) should be DENIED, and that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 25) should be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In this matter, Plaintiff James Hale alleges violations of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 701, which, inter alia, affords…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jones v. McDonoughDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2021