Legal Opinion

Home Pattern Co. v. Mascho

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 20, 1915No. 4234PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from District Court-, Lincoln County; Chas. B. Wilson, Jr., Judge. Action by the Home Pattern Company against A. E. Miascho. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

BEEWEE, C.

The Home Pattern Company sued A. E. Mascho, defendant in error, in the district court of Lincoln county on a written contract, wherein defendant had agreed to handle a line of patterns and stylebooks produced by plaintiff for a limited period of time, and in which suit it was sought to collect in the first count a certain amount of indebtedness alleged to be due under the terms of the contract; and in the second count a certain sum of money which it was alleged had accrued as stipulated or liquidated damages because of breach in the contract. The petition was challenged by demurrer:…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mansur-Tebbetts Implement Co. v. WilletSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  2. J. W. Ripy & Son v. Art Wall Paper MillsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Haier v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. J. I Case Plowworks v. StewartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Childs v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. C. I. T. Corporation v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Great Southwestern Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Horse Shoe Mining Co. v. Red Rose Lead & Zinc Mining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API