Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Great Southwestern Petroleum Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 30, 1923No. 11694PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

MAXEX, C.

The first proposition urged by plaintiff in error is: That neither by allegation in the pleadings nor by any evidence is a cause of action alleged or shown in favor of the individual plaintiffs against the defendiant. Under this proposition, plaintiff in error insists that the assignment of a one-half interest to the various individuals, defendants in error, without notice to it, or without its acceptance of such assignment has the effect of discharging it on its bond. On this proposition, he cites the ease of Mandeville v. Welch, 5 Wheaton, 277, which is a case involving…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mandeville v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  2. Fire Insurance Companies v. FelrathSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  3. Hartford Fire Ins. v. DavenportMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Whitaker v. HawleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  5. McAlester v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Finance Corporation v. Modern Materials CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  2. Claude Neon Federal Co. v. LarkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API