Legal Opinion

Cliffe v. Pacific Mail S. S. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California

Decided June 28, 1897No. 12,279PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action at law, to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of the defendant. Demurrer to the amended complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Circuit Judge.

This is an action to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of the defendant. A demurrer has been interposed to the amended complaint on the ground that neither of the two causes of action set out in the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The; first cause of action states, substantially, that the plaintiff was employed by a firm of stevedores to unload rock ballast from the steamship City of Sydney, owned and operated by the defendant; that while so engaged in said work it was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. The Max MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Schmidt v. BauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Gerrity v. Bark Kate CannDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1880
  4. The HeliosDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1882
  5. The Max MorrisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1885

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hicks v. Peninsula Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Harvey v. Old Dominion S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  3. Polluck v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
  4. The St. GothardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API