Legal Opinion

Gerrity v. Bark Kate Cann

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided April 27, 1880PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Benedict, D. J.

This action is brought to recover damages for personal injuries caused by the falling of a mass of dunnage and plank upon the libellant while he was engaged in trimming the cargo of the bark Kate Cann, in the harbor of New York, on the twenty-first day of November, 1878.

The facts are as follows: The bark Kate Cann was an English vessel, under a charter to receive and transport a cargo of grain. The grain was being put into the vessel from an elevator in the Atlantic dock. The libellant was one of several persons who had agreed to trim the grain as it came into the hold from the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thomas v. . WinchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  2. Philadelphia, Wilmington, & Baltimore Railroad v. Philadelphia & Havre De Grace Steam Towboat Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1860
  3. Board of Comm'rs of Tippecanoe Cty. v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Railroad Company v. HanningSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  5. Board of Education v. AremanNew York Court of Appeals · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Watts v. JensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898
  3. Ahlgren v. Red Star Towing & Transp. Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  4. Frank C. Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
  5. Pioneer S. S. Co. v. McCannCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API