Legal Opinion
Scott v. Bennett
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 26, 1929No. 18590PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BENNETT, C.
The parties to this suit appear here in the inverse order in which they appear in the trial court. They will be referred to herein as plaintiff and defendant in the order in which they appeared in the said court.
W. E. Bennett is the owner of a promissory note for $658 due June 23, 1923, and executed by J. Winfield Scott, and the said Bennett claims also that he was at one time the legal and equitable owner and holder of certain collateral to said note, to-wit, a certain promissory note for $4,000 made by R. P. Bowles and wife, Hattie M. Bowles, to John W. Scott. This collateral…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Grosshart v. McNealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Burkholder v. CasadIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Hess v. HartwigSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- Indiana Trust Co. v. ByramIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
- Bryan v. PalmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Berry v. JanewaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Blackwell Oil & Gas Co. v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Ogle v. Oklahoma City Horse & Mule Com. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Ward v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Bowman v. LedbetterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.