Legal Opinion

Ogle v. Oklahoma City Horse & Mule Com. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 19, 1935No. 23931PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was commenced in the district court of Oklahoma county and suit was filed for recovery of the balance of a payment on hay. The Oklahoma City Horse & Mule Commission Company will be referred to as it appeared in the court below, plaintiff, and the other parties as defendants.

Plaintiff purchased a quantity of hay from defendants and paid $1,800 thereon. The hay owned by defendants was in two barns; one barn, referred to as the south barn, contained from 100 to 110 tons of baled hay; the other barn, referred to as the north barn, contained from 50 to 00 tons of baled hay and about 40…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Blackwood v. Cutting Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Mounts v. Boardman Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Brooks v. TynerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Foster v. RopesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  5. Grosshart v. McNealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lillie v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1965
  2. Cravens v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
  3. Commercial Standard Insurance Company v. Universal UnderwritersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  4. Burkhard v. BurkhardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  5. Gilmore, Gardner & Kirk Oil Co. v. HarvelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API