Blackwell v. Faucett
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Moore, J., Cherokee, January, 1920. Action in Magistrate’s Court by Joe Blackwell against W. T. Faucett. Judgment for plaintiff affirmed by Circuit Court and defendant appeals. cite: Parol testimony inadmissible to vary terms of a written contract: 46 S. C., 411; 77 S. C, 191; 83 S. C., 204; 90 S. C., 541; 27 S. C„ 376; 69 S. C., 93; 84 S. C., 181; 104 S. C., 461; 109 S. C., 29; 111 S. C., 287; 113 S. C., 223. Prior or contemporaneous negotiations merged in written…
Read the full summary
Before Moore, J., Cherokee, January, 1920. Action in Magistrate’s Court by Joe Blackwell against W. T. Faucett. Judgment for plaintiff affirmed by Circuit Court and defendant appeals. cite: Parol testimony inadmissible to vary terms of a written contract: 46 S. C., 411; 77 S. C, 191; 83 S. C., 204; 90 S. C., 541; 27 S. C„ 376; 69 S. C., 93; 84 S. C., 181; 104 S. C., 461; 109 S. C., 29; 111 S. C., 287; 113 S. C., 223. Prior or contemporaneous negotiations merged in written contract: 77 S. C., 191; 2 Elliott Cants., Secs. 1510, 1620; 3 Ell.' Conts, Sec. 1983; 17 Cyc., 596; 104 S. C., 461.…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Cothran.
Action in magistrate Court for $100, the value of certain shingles and cement alleged to be the property of the plaintiff, and wrongfully converted to his own use by the defendant. Judgment for the plaintiff; appeal to Circuit Court; judgment of magistrate affirmed; defendant appeals.
These are the facts of this controversy, as we gather them from the record:
In the fall of 1919 the plaintiff, Blackwell, bargained with the defendant, Faucett, for a tract of land at the price of $3,500, payable $100 cash, the assumption of an…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Griffin v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
- Gill v. RugglesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
3Cited by13 opinions
- Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co. v. JoyceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
- United States Leasing Corp. v. Janicare, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
- Gladden v. KeistlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
- Hyder v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
- Newell Contracting Co. v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.