Griffin v. Southern Ry.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Action by Jose Griffin against Southern Railway. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. cite: Judge should have heard equity issue: 33 S. C., 77; 13 S. C., 98; 17 S. C., 544; 18 S. C., 333; 31 S. C., 403; 13 S. C., 54; 54 S. C., 155; 104 Fed. R., 754; 94 U. S., 307; 83 Fed. R., 437; 186 Penn.
Read the full summary
Action by Jose Griffin against Southern Railway. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. cite: Judge should have heard equity issue: 33 S. C., 77; 13 S. C., 98; 17 S. C., 544; 18 S. C., 333; 31 S. C., 403; 13 S. C., 54; 54 S. C., 155; 104 Fed. R., 754; 94 U. S., 307; 83 Fed. R., 437; 186 Penn. St., 145; 38 S. C., 199; 56 S. C., 514. No proof of death of husband, and nonsuit should have been granted: 43 S. C., 499. No evidence tending to show ptmitive damages, nonsiiit should have been granted as to that: 65 S- C., 133; 19 Kan., 83. If testimony of plaintiff would not support a…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Chief Justice Pope.
This is an action for damages alleged by the plaintiff that she sustained by the wreck of the defendant’s railway train on the 8th day of' May, 1901, at a point a few miles from Trenton, Edgefield County, S. C. The answer denied all the allegations of facts set up in the complaint except the corporate character.of the defendant, the accident to its train No. 135, on May 8, 1901, and that the plaintiff was a passenger for hire on said train at the time of the accident; but the answer insists that the plaintiff is a married woman,…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Fludd v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
- New York Life Insurance Co. v. GreerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
- Blackwell v. FaucettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
- Peeples v. HornikSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
- Stack v. HaiglerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.