Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Verhovec v. Mascio

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1998No. 97-2446PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) provides that in original actions other than habeas corpus filed in this court, “[ajfter the time for filing an answer to the complaint or a motion to dismiss, the Supreme Court will either dismiss the case or issue an alternative or a peremptory writ, if a writ has not already been issued.” If the pertinent facts are uncontroverted and from these facts it appears beyond doubt that relators are entitled to the requested extraordinary relief, a peremptory writ will issue. See, e.g., State ex rel. Findlay Publishing Co. v. Schroeder (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 580, 583, 669 N.E.2d…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. State ex rel. Findlay Publishing Co. v. SchroederOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State ex rel. Miley v. ParrottOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State ex rel. Askew v. GoldhartOhio Supreme Court · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State ex rel. McGrath v. McDonnellOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State ex rel. Charvat v. FryeOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. N. Park Retirement Community Ctr., Inc. v. Sovran Cos., Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. McWilliams v. SchumacherOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Lenard v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API