Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Charvat v. Frye

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 2007No. 2006-2275PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} This is an appeal from a judgment granting a writ of procedendo to compel a common pleas court judge to proceed in a civil case. Because the judge erroneously stayed the case, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

{¶ 2} Appellee, Philip J. Charvat, resides with his family at their home in Westerville, Ohio. In 2004, Charvat received telemarketing calls for satellite transmission services that were made on behalf of Dish TV Now, Inc. (“Dish TV”) and Echostar Satellite, L.L.C. (“Echostar”). According to Charvat, each of these telephone calls began with a prerecorded message, and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ewing v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. State ex rel. Morgan v. City of New LexingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State ex rel. Davis v. Public Employees Retirement BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State ex rel. Weiss v. HooverOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Mainstream Marketing Services, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Charvat v. EchoStar Satellite, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  2. Briscoe v. U.S. Restoration & Remodeling, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. King v. DivokyOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. State ex rel. Sawicki v. Court of Common Pleas of Lucas Cty.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Charvat v. RyanOhio Supreme Court · 2007

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API