Legal Opinion

Tomecek v. Bavas

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 2008No. Docket 134665PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

This case involves real property to which plaintiffs seek an easement for the purpose of connecting to a city sewer across the lots of their neighbors. The issues are (1) whether the Land Division Act (LDA)1 can be used to create substantive property rights, such as a utility easement, (2) whether an easement by necessity for utilities should be allowed in this case, and (3) whether the restrictive covenant that runs with the land in question bars the easement.

*487The Court of Appeals held that the LDA provides for substantive changes to property rights and gives the trial court the authority to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Eggleston v. Bio-Medical Applications of Detroit, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Neal v. WilkesMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Yaldo v. North Pointe InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Chapdelaine v. SochockiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Blackhawk Development Corp. v. Village of DexterMichigan Supreme Court · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Wiggins v. City of BurtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Beach v. Lima TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Charles A. Murray Trust v. FutrellMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Morse v. ColittiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Dana R. Hodges Trust v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API