Legal Opinion

Yaldo v. North Pointe Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1998No. 107032, Calendar No. 7PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

In this case, we are asked to determine the applicable rate of interest on a judgment for plaintiff because of defendant’s failure to pay plaintiff’s claim under an insurance contract. We hold that the lower courts properly found that subsection 5 not subsection 6 of MCL 600.6013; MSA 27A.6013 is controlling. Therefore, we affirm the award of twelve percent interest to plaintiff.

i

In 1988, plaintiff sold his business, the New Inkster Market, to Kanouno Enterprises, Inc. Kanouno signed a land contract and executed a promissory note and security agreement. An insurance policy was issued,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Cardinal Mooney High School v. Michigan High School Athletic Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Smith v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  5. McCahill v. Commercial Union InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Adrian School District v. Michigan Public School Employees' Retirement SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Harvey v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Zdrojewski v. MurphyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Petersen v. Magna Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
  5. People v. ConatMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API