Legal Opinion

Rabago v. Meraz

California Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1963No. L. A. No. 27130PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment, based upon a jury verdict, in favor of defendant in an action for damages for injuries suffered by plaintiff when defendant drove his automobile, in which plaintiff was riding, into a parked vehicle. As the main ground for reversal she contends that the trial court erred in its instructions. We are of the opinion that, for the reasons set forth below, the jury was erroneously instructed, and that the judgment must be reversed.

The principal questions presented revolve around plaintiff’s status at the moment of the accident. To assess properly these problems…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Martinez v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Follansbee v. BenzenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Whitmore v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Ray v. HanischCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Rocha v. HulenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. RamirezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Knudsen v. Merle Hay Plaza, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  3. Wagner v. OsbornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Teixeira v. VerissimoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Sinclair v. BarkerOregon Supreme Court · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API