Szusta v. Krawiec
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Baldrige, J.,
This appeal by defendants is from a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $1250, in an action of assumpsit brought to recover the value of domestic services rendered. The appellants contend that the plaintiff in her statement of claim alleged a breach of an oral contract whereby she was to ¡receive a specific remuneration for her services and that she failed to prove the contract; that the evidence established only the performance of services and that the verdict rendered was on a quantum meruit basis therefor. It is argued that this variance in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hertzog v. Hertzog's AdministratorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
- Witten v. StoutSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Byrne's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Bemis Et Ux. v. Van Pelt, Exr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Conkle v. Byers' Exr.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lach v. Fleth, Admr.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Fahringer v. Strine EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Leppold's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- McWilliams EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Rack v. Anu Steel Wire Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fayette County1997