Legal Opinion

Bemis Et Ux. v. Van Pelt, Exr.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 27, 1939No. Appeal, 91PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Rhodes, J.,

Plaintiffs brought this action against the executor of the last will and testament of decedent to recover damages for the breach of an oral contract whereby they were to render personal services to decedent, and he was to compensate them by leaving them real and personal property in his will. Prior to the trial the heirs and devisees of decedent were joined as additional defendants. Following a verdict for plaintiffs, defendants’ motions for judgment in their favor n. o. v. and for a new trial were refused, whereupon they took this appeal.

There are twenty assignments of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gilbraith's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Graham v. Graham's ExecutorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
  3. Mooney's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Hertzog v. Hertzog's AdministratorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
  5. Kauss v. RohnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Stafford v. Reed, Admr.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Stafford v. ReedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Fahringer v. Strine EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Cramer v. McKinneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Zawada v. Pennsylvania System Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API