Legal Opinion
Texas Instruments, Inc. v. United States International Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided November 19, 1986No. Appeal 85-2776PublishedCited by 140 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
In this action brought under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1337, Texas Instruments, Inc. (“TI”) appeals the final decision of the United States International Trade Commission. The Commission held that there was no statutory violation in that TPs U.S. Patent No. 3,819,921 (“ ’921 patent”) was not infringed by certain imported calculators, and that there was no industry in the United States practicing an invention covered by any claim of the ’921 patent. 1 We affirm the decision of non-infringement, and thus do not reach the issue of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by140 opinions
- Teleflex, Inc. v. Ficosa North America Corp., Fico Cables, S.A., and Ficosa North America S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Comark Communications, Inc. v. Harris CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Sage Products, Inc. v. Devon Industries, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Multiform Desiccants, Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Medzam, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- C.R. Bard, Inc. v. M3 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.