Legal Opinion

Christy v. Rice

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1908No. Docket No. 31PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to Kent; Perkins, J. Case by William H. Christy against Frank E. Rice for malicious prosecution. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The defendant was, in May, 1906, president of the village of Sparta. There was presented to the common council of the village a saloon-keeper’s bond signed by the plaintiff and one F. J. Baird as sureties. This bond was approved by a majority vote of the council, and a day or two later, the defendant, at the request of, or, at least, after a conference with, other citizens of the village, and after a paper had been circulated signed by numerous parties, and among others, the defendant, providing for furnishing the means of prosecuting the case if necessary, went to Grand Rapids and called…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. AustinMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Eno v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Matthews v. Blue Cross and Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Zenik v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  3. Gowin v. HeiderOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Ryan v. Orient InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  5. Weiden v. WeidenMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API