Legal Opinion

Eno v. Allen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1897PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Monroe; Kinne, J. Case by Adna Eno against Horace H. Allen for malicious prosecution. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This action is for malicious prosecution. Plaintiff showed that his arrest was under a warrant issued on a complaint made by defendant charging him (plaintiff) with the larceny of a quantity of clover seed, and further showed that he was discharged from this arrest. Defendant did not, upon this trial, contend that plaintiff was guilty of the offense of larceny, but showed the fact that the clover seed that the plaintiff was charged with having stolen was stolen from defendant, and gave evidence tending to show a combination of circumstances which pointed to the plaintiff as the perpetrator of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. AustinMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ruhala v. RobyMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Renda v. International Union, UAWMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Rosenberg v. MagedaMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Christy v. RiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Ruhala v. RobyMichigan Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API