Legal Opinion

Smith v. Austin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1882PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to Sent. Case for malicious prosecution. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, C. J.

The plaintiff made oath on a trial before a referee and also on a motion for a new trial in the same case, and the question occurred whether she had not therein committed perjury. The defendant having some-connection with the subject of the litigation and also cognizance of facts bearing on the question proceeded to consult the assistant prosecuting attorney in relation thereto and in contemplation of the institution of criminal proceedings in-case that an occasion therefor was considered as existing.. That officer received the information given by the defendant and made likewise such further…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hamilton v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Matthews v. Blue Cross and Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Hicks v. BrantleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  3. Renda v. International Union, UAWMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Burnham v. Collateral Loan Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  5. El Reno Gas & Electric Co. v. SpurgeonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API