Hartung v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALBROOKS, Judge.
Appellant Ryan Charles Hartung challenges the district court’s order sustaining the revocation of his driver’s license under the implied-consent law, arguing that he was denied meaningful consultation with his attorney when the arresting officer declined to provide him with the exact preliminary breath test (PBT) result. He further argues that this refusal violated his due-process right to potentially exculpatory evidence. Because appellant’s right to counsel was vindicated, we affirm.
FACTS
Elk River Police Officer Anthony Musa-tob arrested appellant for DWI after…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- State v. WiernaszSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Kuhn v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mell v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. KoppiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010