Legal Opinion

Shattenkirk v. Finnerty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 1, 1983PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Mahoney, P. J.

Section 7 of chapter 460 of the Laws of 1982 authorized an 8% salary increase effective April 1, 1983 for positions designated management/confidential pursuant to article 14 of the Civil Service Law (see Civil Service Law, § 130, subd 1, par d). Petitioner Eugene Tashman holds a non-statutory exempt position with a management/confidential salary grade of M-6. Petitioner Charles Shattenkirk holds a competitive class position classified as management/confidential with a salary grade of M-6. Petitioners did not receive the 8% increase because of Budget Bulletin…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Levine v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Dorsey v. Stuyvesant Town Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. County of Oneida v. BerleNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Shattenkirk v. FinnertyNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Bertoldi v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Schneider v. AmbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Brown v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. Margolis v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API