Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Zoning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 17, 1968PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThim, J.
The defendant zoning commission extended a business zone to include about one acre of land which had previously been within a residential zone. The plaintiffs, who are property owners and residents in the neighborhood, have taken the present appeal from a judgment dismissing their appeal in the Court of Common Pleas.
I
The plaintiffs claim that the trial court committed error by concluding that two members of the zoning commission, A. Peter Lomaglio and Lawrence Bottone, were not disqualified from participating in the hearing and the decision on the application for a change of zone. We do not…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Van Itallie v. Borough of Franklin LakesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Genkinger v. New CastleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Kutcher v. Town Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Aldom v. Borough of RoselandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Low v. Town of MadisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Cioffoletti v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Petrowski v. Norwich Free AcademySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- L. Wayne Furtney v. Simsbury Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Fletcher v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Holt-Lock, Inc. v. Zoning & Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.