Legal Opinion

Town of Selma v. Brewer

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 21, 1908No. Civ. No. 485PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Joel H. Smith, George B. Graham, and Graham & Wallace, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The object of this action is to recover from the defendant penalties aggregating the sum of $3,360 for the alleged violations of the provisions of ordinance No. 98 of the town of Selma, entitled, “An Ordinance for Police Regulation, Relating to and making unlawful the keeping of places where intoxicating liquors are sold; the sale of intoxicating liquors, the storing, providing and having intoxicating liquors to be sold, or at all, except in certain cases, in the Town of Selma, County of Fresno, State of California, and within the corporate limits of said Town; Providing penalties for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Merced County v. Helm & NolanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. County of San Luis Obispo v. HendricksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Massey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
  2. Lakes v. GoodloeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  3. State v. PhillipsMississippi Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Downing v. California State Board of PharmacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. People v. GarciaAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API