County of San Luis Obispo v. Hendricks
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County. The facts are stated in the opinion of Commissioner Searls.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
For the reasons stated in the opinion of Department Two, judgment reversed, with directions to the court below to enter a judgment for the defendant.
Myrick J., and McKee, J., dissented.
The following is the opinion of Department Two above referred to, rendered on the 30th of June, 1886: —
Searls, C.
This is an action to recover from the defendant the sum of $150, the amount of a license for carrying on, for eighteen months from November 1,1883, the business and occupation of selling spirituous, malt, and fermented liquors and wines in less quantities than one quart within the said…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Perry v. WashburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- People v. SeymourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Himmelman v. DanosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Dye v. DyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Ex parte BenjaminCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Merced County v. Helm & NolanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Pacific Paving Co. v. VizelichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- City of St. Louis v. United Railways Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1915
- Sawyer v. BarbourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Shubat v. Glacier CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1932
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.