Legal Opinion

People v. Garcia

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided April 27, 1934No. Cr. A. No. 1029PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, P. J.

We have before us on a single record appeals in four cases which were tried together, and which all involve charges of violation of our statute regulating the practice of pharmacy. (Stats, of 1905, p. 535, secs. 1, 12, 13 and' 17, as amended by Stats, of 1933, p. 2192, sec. 16, as amended by Stats, of 1929, p. 239.) All of these cases arose since the amendments of 1933 became effective. The Pharmacy Act, in addition to the portions to be later specifically mentioned, contains provisions for the appointment of a State Board of Pharmacy, with power to regulate the practice of pharmacy, to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
  2. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Ex Parte HornefCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. People v. O'BrienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. State v. ZotalisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Scott v. Continental InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. State v. . BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Downing v. California State Board of PharmacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. People v. ArthurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. People v. OrtizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API