Legal Opinion
McConney v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 23, 1978No. Civ. A. 75-2077PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RAYMOND J. BRODERICK, District Judge.
Plaintiff, William McConney (“McConney”), brings this action under § 301(a) of the Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”), 29 U.S.C. § 185(a), alleging breach of a collective bargaining agreement. Defendants in this action are: The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company (“A&P”), McConney’s former employer, who is charged with discharging him in breach of the agreement; and Baker’s Local # 492 (“Union”), McConney’s union, charged with violating its duty under the agreement to fairly represent McConney in processing his grievance…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Bazarte v. United Transportation UnionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- William G. Whitten v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc., and Local 377, Teamsters' UnionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Weaver-Bailey Contractors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Aguinaga v. John Morrell & Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1986
- Larsen v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Bank Building & Equipment Corp. of America v. Mack Local 677 Federal Credit UnionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Personal Touch, Inc. v. Lenox, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.