Bazarte v. United Transportation Union
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FREEDMAN, Circuit Judge.
The primary question which this case presents is whether there was sufficient evidence to justify a jury’s finding that the defendant union failed in its duty of fair representation in prosecuting plaintiff’s grievance against his discharge by his employer.
Plaintiff was employed as a railroad fireman by the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company on a shift from 3:15 p. m. to 11:15 p. m., subject to being required for overtime work. In violation of company Rule 0 which forbids an employee from engaging “in other business without permission from the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Humphrey v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Tunstall v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & EnginemenSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Allen L. Griffin v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, UawCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
- Findley v. Jones Motor FreightCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- William Minnis v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, UawCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- John T. Demars v. General Dynamics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Edward T. Cannon v. Consolidated Freightways Corp. And Teamsters Local 710Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.