Legal Opinion
Personal Touch, Inc. v. Lenox, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 16, 1988No. Civ. A. No. 87-6331PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LOWELL A. REED, Jr., District Judge.
Presently before the court is the motion of the plaintiff The Personal Touch, Inc. for a jury trial pursuant to Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the motion of the defendant Lenox, Inc. to strike plaintiff’s demand for a jury trial. For the reasons set forth below, the motion of the plaintiff will be denied and the motion of the defendant will be granted.
Plaintiff commenced this action on October 6,1987. A timely demand for a jury trial was never made in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 38(b). That Rule provides, in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Walton v. Eaton Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Virgil Cochran v. Francis J. Birkel, Virginia Hager, Bettie Klontz, and Kathy Rubens, All IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Johnnie Wall v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Biesenkamp v. Atlantic Richfield Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- Kalmanovitz v. G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schweich v. Ziegler, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Early v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
- Schweich v. Ziegler, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990