Legal Opinion
Warner Bros. v. American Lady Corset Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 4, 1943No. 209PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge.
In the court below the plaintiff’s suit involved both collection of royalties under a license and patent infringement after termination of the license, but the appeal presents only the latter phase of the litigation. The plaintiff is assignee of patent No. 1,995,801 granted March 26, 1935, on the application of John Field. All claims of the patent were in suit except claims 8 and 11. The district court held that claims 1, 4 and 5 were invalid because of anticipation by the Roth prior use and that the other claims in suit, 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, and 10, if not also anticipated,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Altoona Publix Theatres, Inc. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Ruben Condenser Co. v. Copeland Refrigeration Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Kissock v. Duquesne Steel Foundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929
- Warner Bros. v. American Lady Corset Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942
- Warner Bros. v. Treo Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1940
3Cited by9 opinions
- Copease Manufacturing Co. v. Cormac Photocopy Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Karl E. Stiegele and Speidel Corporation v. J. M. Moore Import-Export Co., Inc., Moore Products Corporation and Joseph Mitchell MooreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- The H. W. Gossard Co. v. J. C. Penney CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
- F. E. Myers & Brother Co. v. Goulds Pumps, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1950
- Container Co. v. Carpenter Container Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.