Legal Opinion
Warner Bros. v. Treo Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 11, 1940No. Civ. No. 674PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.
This is an action for infringement of Field patent No. 1,995,801. The patent in suit was issüed March 26, 1935 upon an application filed March 11, 1933 as a division of an earlier application, Serial No. 623,093, filed July 18, 1932. The patent relates to corsets or girdles of elastic fabric.
The plaintiff claims infringement of claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9 and 10, which read as follows:
“Claim 1. In a garment of the character described adapted to e'ncircle the hips of the wearer, material capable of stretching up and down as well as across and lying at least in part…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smokador Mfg. Co. v. Tubular Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- Forsyth v. GarlockCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1905
- Electric Machinery Mfg. Co. v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Scott v. Fisher Knitting Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
- Elkon Works, Inc. v. Welworth Automotive Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Warner Bros. v. American Lady Corset Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943