Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Ervin v. May

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 24, 1939No. 31,992PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 285 N.W. 834. The intervening respondents have moved to dismiss the appeal in the above entitled matter on the ground of duplicity and nonappealability. The proceeding was one to condemn land for highway purposes, and the two interveners, owning separate parcels, were made parties to the proceedings. The commissioners awarded $660 damages to Alois Burda and $350 damages to Frank M. Korbel. The state by one notice of appeal attempted to appeal from both these awards, and when the appeal came up for hearing in the district court it was dismissed for duplicity by what was in effect…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ballou v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  2. County of Sangamon v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
  3. State, Benson v. LesslieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  4. Village of Broadview v. DianishIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  5. State ex rel. Hilton v. UmbergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. RadosevichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  2. County of Hennepin v. HoltSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. State v. JudeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. United States v. Federal Land BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  5. State v. PriebeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API