Legal Opinion

State v. Keating

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 5, 1964PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouse, J.

John Keating and Vincent Joseph, the appellants in these two cases, were tried with Armand Lupo, Roland Arvisais, and Augustine Prete by a jury on a short-form information, authorized by Practice Book, 1963, § 493, charging that they and others conspired to obtain money by false pretenses. The offense was not otherwise specified except that each of them “did combine, confederate and agree with one another, and with others to said [the State’s] Attorney unknown, to obtain money by false pretenses, in violation of Section 53-360 of the General Statutes, Revision of 1958; and in pursuance of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

United States v. Austin-Bagley CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
State v. PundySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
State v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
State v. WaltersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
State v. ReidSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
State v. LeecanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
State v. HintonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
State v. ReedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
State v. WatsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.