Legal Opinion
Boiselle v. Rogoff
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 8, 1940PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
This action was brought by the named plaintiff, referred to in this opinion as the plaintiff, against, the named defendant, herein referred to as the defendant, and his wife. ■ The plaintiff Southern New England Contractors’ Supply Company intervened as the plaintiff’s employer which had paid compensation. We consider first the defendant’s appeal from the denial of his motion to set aside the verdict for the plaintiffs and also from the judgment in their favor.
On November 24, 1936, the defendant was the pro prietor of a gasoline service station in New London and engaged in repairing and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Krowka v. Colt Patent Fire Arm Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Dombron v. RogozinskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Kulinski v. SavinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Frogge v. ShugrueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Kilday v. VoltzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. HayesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. RubinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Molitor v. MolitorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Murphy v. DantowitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Smith v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.