In re the Marriage of Cave

Husband appeals from a dissolution judgment. He assigns error to the following provision of the judgment:

“[W]ith respect to * * * [husband’s] pension program * * * to the extent that those benefits have vested and accrued on the date that this decree becomes final, that each of the parties is awarded 50% of the monthly pension payments as they become due including any future cost of living increases as a property division * * *.”

Husband contends that it was error not to use the actuarial present value method to compute the division of the pension, which is vested but not matured.1 See Rogers…