Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Marriage of Tough

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 30, 2013No. 850363; A150941Published

1DissentArmstrong, P. J.

In reversing the trial court, the majority ultimately— and erroneously — concludes that the trial court’s qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) conflicts with the underlying dissolution judgment that it was designed to implement. It does not.

To reach its conclusion, the majority reasons as follows: The dissolution judgment expressly provides that wife is not entitled to claim any pension benefits that accrued to husband after the dissolution of the parties’ marriage. By applying the time rule, the QDRO awards wife pension benefits that accrued to husband after the dissolution of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of RichardsonOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Matter of Marriage of RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. Matter of Marriage of RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. In re the Marriage of RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. Matter of Marriage of VinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API