Legal Opinion

E & K Agency, Inc. v. Van Dyke

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 1, 1972PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mountain, J.

This case has had a long and rather complicated procedural history which must be briefly reviewed.

George W. Yan Dyke and Theodore Sofield, defendants in the action, were the beneficial owners of the stock of several corporations which, in turn, owned valuable waterfront land. This property was listed for sale with the plaintiff real estate agency in March, 1965. Efforts to sell the land resulted in the execution and delivery of a contract in August, 1965 with prospective purchasers named Lane and Sherman. Just before the contract was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. J. M. Hamilton & Co. v. PrescottTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Barnett v. JaspanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  3. Liquire Ins. Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  4. Joyce v. ZacharyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
  5. Great American Health & Life Insurance Co. v. LothringerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kure v. Chevrolet Motor DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Dunn v. PraissSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  3. Materia v. HuffMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  4. Wigton v. LavenderOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. FullerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API