Legal Opinion
First Union National Bank v. Broyhill
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided December 16, 1964PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtMooRe, J.
This will confers upon the trustees no express power of sale. This the plaintiffs concede. The question is whether such power is conferred by implication.
*192Applicable principles are succinctly stated in Hall v. Wardwell, 228 N.C. 562, 46 S.E. 2d 556, as follows:
“In the absence of authority conferred by the will, ... a trustee under a testamentary trust has no authority to convey the fee in the land devised. But the power to convey need not be expressly conferred. It may be implied from the context of the will. 54 A.J., 349. It is purely a question of testamentary intent. Tippett v. Tippett, 7…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Morris v. MorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Foil v. Newsome.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Powell v. . WoodcockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Brinn v. . BrinnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Ripley v. . ArmstrongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- FIRST UNION NAT. BANK OF NC v. BroyhillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964