Legal Opinion

Ripley v. . Armstrong

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 22, 1912PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from judgment rendered by Foushee, J., 25 April, 1912; from Henderson.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

Tbe plaintiff contracted to sell a tract of 17% acres to tbe defendant, wbo now, refuses to pay for tbe same upon tbe ground that tbe plaintiff cannot' execute a good title. Tbe plaintiff acquired title under tbe will of bis wife.

Two questions are presented on tbis appeal. It appears in tbe probate of tbe will that tbe testatrix, “bolding tbe instrument in ber bands, with ber name written at tbe bottom, acknowledged and declared tbe same to be ber last will and testament; that the same bad been signed by ber; that she then and there requested tbe witnesses to sign tbe instrument, which they…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Parks v. Robinson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Crawford v. . WearnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  3. Campbell's Executors v. LeachSuperior Court of North Carolina · 1803
  4. In re the Will of HerringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Heyer v. BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. Heyer v. . BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Taylor v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. Hubbard v. WigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Johnson v. SalsburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API