Foil v. Newsome.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
PROCEEDING for partition by T. A. Eoil and others against A. H. Newsome and others, heard by Judge G. M. OooTce, at the November Term, 1904, of the Superior Court of' Rowan County, upon agreed facts. From the judgment rendered, both parties appealed. PLAINTIFFS’ APPEAL.
1Opinion of the Court
WALKER, J., did not sit in these appeals. PLAINTIFF'S APPEAL. (116) This was a petition for sale of land for partition The plaintiffs claimed an undivided interest in the locus in quo with defendant Ingold Newsome, as heirs at law of Tobias Kesler. Defendant Ingold Newsome claimed that she was sole seized for life, remainder to her children and other defendants, under the will of said Kesler. That defendant James H. Ramsey, trustee, was empowered under the provisions of the will to sell the land and invest the proceeds for the purpose of executing the trust declared therein. The cause having…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Holt v. HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
- Foust v. . Ireland and HurdleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1853
- Page v. . FoustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- Doe Ex Dem. Boyd v. LathamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1853
- Pippin v. . EllisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1851
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. WolfeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- McCallum v. . McCallumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Ferguson v. . FergusonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Jones v. . MyattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Roberts v. . SaundersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.