Martin v. Martin

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

The wife’s libel, praying for a divorce a mensa et thoro, charged cruelties and indignities. Respondent did not file an answer, and offered no testimony except to deny the charge of his wife that he called her a ‘fairy’. The master reported that libellant and her witness testified in an honest and truthful manner, and that, therefore, he found as facts in the case all of the testimony adduced by them,- except that respondent called the libellant the vile epithet. Nevertheless, the master found against the wife, and the court below, overruling libellant’s exceptions to the…