Legal Opinion

Davidsen v. Davidsen

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 1, 1937No. Appeal, 6PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

The respondent wife in this proceeding for a divorce, upon the grounds of cruel and barbarous treatment and indignities, has appealed from a decree entered in favor of her husband by the court below upon the recommendation of a master. We find ourselves unable properly to perform the duty imposed upon us in a case of this kind. That duty is to examine for our selves the testimony and. determine therefrom, independently of the findings of a master or of the court below, whether in truth and in fact a legal cause of divorce has been made out: Nacrelli et al. v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Esenwein v. EsenweinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Nacrelli v. NacrelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Mathias v. MathiasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Rufus L. Sharp v. E. SharpSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Nacrelli, Etc. v. NacrelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. McKrell v. McKrellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Huston v. HustonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Monaco v. MonacoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Clark v. ClarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Martin v. MartinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API