Legal Opinion

Friess v. Friess

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 13, 1944No. Appeal, 17PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

James, J.,

Libellant husband appeals from a decree of the court in banc which disapproved the recommendations of the master to grant a divorce on the ground of indignities to the person, and dismissed the libel. Our reading of the testimony sustains the decision of the court.

Our Divorce Law explicitly provides that the indignities offered to the person of the injured and innocent spouse must “render his or her condition intolerable and life burdensome,” in order to suffice as grounds for divorce. Act of March 19, 1943, P. L. 21, §1, 23 P. 'S. §10(f). It has been repeatedly held, that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Esenwein v. EsenweinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Rommel v. RommelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Davidsen v. DavidsenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Martin v. MartinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Wagner v. WagnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rankin v. RankinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Wasson v. WassonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Faszczewski v. FaszczewskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Megoulas v. MegoulasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. Bonawitz v. BonawitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API