Friess v. Friess
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
James, J.,
Libellant husband appeals from a decree of the court in banc which disapproved the recommendations of the master to grant a divorce on the ground of indignities to the person, and dismissed the libel. Our reading of the testimony sustains the decision of the court.
Our Divorce Law explicitly provides that the indignities offered to the person of the injured and innocent spouse must “render his or her condition intolerable and life burdensome,” in order to suffice as grounds for divorce. Act of March 19, 1943, P. L. 21, §1, 23 P. 'S. §10(f). It has been repeatedly held, that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Esenwein v. EsenweinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Rommel v. RommelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Davidsen v. DavidsenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Martin v. MartinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Wagner v. WagnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Rankin v. RankinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Wasson v. WassonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Faszczewski v. FaszczewskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Megoulas v. MegoulasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Bonawitz v. BonawitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.