Legal Opinion

Phipps v. Phipps

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 27, 1951No. Appeal, 188PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

In this case, the libellant sued for divorce on the grounds of cruel and barbarous treatment and indignities to his person. At trial, he abandoned the cruel and barbarous treatment charge and rested his case on indignities in connection wherewith he proved, inter alia, an act of adultery on the part of the respondent. The learned trial judge entered a decree of divorce which, on appeal, the Superior Court unanimously affirmed (one judge being absent) : see Phipps v. Phipps, 165 Pa. Superior Ct. 622. We granted an allocatur primarily because of an apparent conflict…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Middleton v. MiddletonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  2. McKrell v. McKrellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Nacrelli v. NacrelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Sleight v. SleightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Wick v. WickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Boyer v. BoyerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Rankin v. RankinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Shoemaker v. ShoemakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Trimbur v. TrimburSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Olbum v. OlbumSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API