Legal Opinion
Sanders v. Veneman
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 22, 2001No. CIV.A.00-1419(RMU)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Denying The Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss; Denying Without Prejudice The Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment
URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and (6). The defendant alternatively moves for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. The plaintiff, William Sanders (“the plaintiff’ or “Mr. Sanders”), brings this suit for damages under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. The…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Byrd v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Craig v. Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Sanders v. VenemanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Federal Fire Protection Corp. v. J.A. Jones/Tompkins Builders, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Stewart v. GatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.