Legal Opinion

Ted R. Brown and Associates, Inc. v. CARNES CORPORATION

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1976No. 14057PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUCKETT, Justice:

This is an interlocutory appeal granted to determine whether the motion by the defendant Carnes for release of an attachment constituted a general appearance. From an adverse decision Carnes has brought the case here.

Ted R. Brown and Associates, plaintiff herein, brought this action against Carnes’ and Brown’s successor representative, Long Deming Utah, Inc. The case as it applies to Long Deming is not before the court on appeal. Carnes is a Wisconsin corporation and not qualified to do business in the state of Utah. The plaintiff had entered into an agreement with Carnes and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
  2. Tintic Milling Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Fahey v. O'Melveny & Myers Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. O'Melveny & MyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  4. Bristol v. BrentUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Price v. HansonUtah Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Parry v. Ernst Home Center Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Mallory Engineering, Inc. v. Ted R. Brown & Associates, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Ted R. Brown & Associates, Inc. v. Carnes Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  4. Go Invest Wisely LLC v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
  5. Employers Mutual of Wassau v. Montrose Steel Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API