Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Bertsch

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided February 12, 2004No. 02CA0888PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge DAILEY.

Julie Bertsch (wife) appeals from the permanent orders allocating parental responsibilities of the parties’ two sons to Greg Bertsch (husband). We affirm.

I

Wife contends that the trial court abused its discretion in allocating primary parental responsibility and all decision-making responsibility to husband, contrary to the provisions of § 14-10-124(1.5)(b)(IV)-(V), C.R.S.2003. We disagree.

Section 14-10-124(1.5), C.R.S.2003, provides that a court is to determine the allocation of parental responsibilities, including parenting time and decision-making responsibilities, in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Joseph v. WilesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  2. Hendricks v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  3. United States v. BurchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  4. Slack v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  5. Showpiece Homes Corp. v. Assurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Asphalt Specialties, Co. v. City of Commerce CityColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. In re the Marriage of OhrColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. In re the Marriage of HaddadColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Ken Caryl Ranch Master Ass'n v. Granite State Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Marriage of ThorburnColorado Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API